Saturday, 19 September 2026

Namo-phobia: A Confession From My Microbiology Days

Revisited · originally written in 2016 (originally written in find here

Lost my love. Feeling lonely, feeling uninteresting  I started hating you. Is it me? Is it myself who hates you?
I loved you for months. I'd hug you tight before sleep, thinking about how great our days together were. But now, I hate you. And it's entirely because of me.

Wondering what happened to my love? 
Don't worry  I'm not talking about a boy and a girl. I'm talking about the love between microbiology and me. (Seriously, I still love the subject that much.)

“Favorite. Lovely. Interesting.” These were the words I used every time I solved a previous year's microbio paper. Now? “Boring. Uninteresting.” It used to be such a joy to read about plasmids, transposons, and microbial metabolism. But then came transformation, Hfr transfer, conjugation — cycle after cycle of genes, each with its own function, orientation, and mobilization machinery. Giant, tangled, almost ugly structures of information.

Honestly, I think even the infinite list of castes in India would be easier to memorize than this.

Give me a paper full of concepts, mechanisms, and procedures, and I'll read it happily. But once my professor started teaching transformation and mobilization just to “complete the syllabus,” I lost the thread. Hatash. Genuinely defeated. The gene names involved in tra transposition and transposable elements refuse to stick. A quick glance the night before an exam won't cut it this time — I actually have to study daily. And I'm losing interest exactly when I need to be most focused.

I don't even like the version of myself that shows up in class lately, chatting instead of listening, even though microbiology is my favorite subject and I'm usually the keen one taking it all in. (Not that chatting in class is some grave sin. But it stung a little, coming from me.)

All is well. I just need to refocus and get back the spirit of learning. But memorizing genuinely one of the hardest jobs in the world.

And then there's my other weakness: I forget names. Not conversations — I remember those in detail, sometimes years later. Just names. It's caused more friendship trouble than I'd like to admit. I'll run into someone after a gap and have to ask, “Sorry, what's your name again?” I know exactly how bad that sounds.

I've tried fixing it:

Repeating a new name two or three times right after hearing it.
Apologizing in advance “Sorry, I might have to ask your name again someday, I have this problem.”
Neither worked. The long conversation stays with me. The name alone slips away.

I think I'll just call it Namo-phobia.

That's all fine, though. 😂

Friday, 18 September 2026

MOPGA 2027: A Fully Funded Year in France for Early Career Researchers


If you're a recent PhD graduate working on climate, environment, or health, this one is worth a look. 

The tenth edition of the Make Our Planet Great Again (MOPGA) Visiting Fellowship has opened, offering international researchers a funded year at a French research institution.

What is MOPGA?
MOPGA is a flagship postdoctoral mobility programme of the French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs, run by Campus France. Launched in 2018, it supports researchers tackling major environmental and climate challenges. This edition aims to strengthen scientific input on the issues discussed at the COP climate conferences.
Research themes
Projects must fall under one of five areas:
Earth system sciences
Climate change and sustainability sciences
Energy transition
Societal challenges related to environmental issues
Human, animal and environmental health under the One Health approach
Projects using advanced technologies get particular consideration. One Health projects must genuinely link human health, animal health, and ecosystems. Purely medical or human-health projects are not eligible.
What the fellowship offers
€2,500 per month for 12 months
€500 settling-in allowance
Health insurance, civil liability insurance, and repatriation assistance
French Government Scholarship (BGF) status, paid directly by Campus France
It doesn't cover international travel, and the host lab receives no funding. 

The fellowship isn't renewable and can't be combined with a French employment contract or other French government individual funding.
Who can apply?
You must:
Have defended your PhD between December 2021 and December 2026

Hold non-French nationality
Not be living and working in France at the time of application

Documents include:
A CV with publications (4 pages max)
Your doctoral degree certificate
Your host supervisor's CV (2 pages max)
A supervisor support letter, co-signed by or accompanied by a commitment letter from the lab director
1 to 3 recommendation letters
A passport or ID copy

Key dates
15 September 2026: Applications open
15 December 2026: Deadline
Between September and December 2027: Fellows arrive in France

Tips before you apply

Secure your host lab early. Finding one is part of the application, so use the Research in France Portal or your supervisor's 
contacts.

Define your project first. 
Campus France advises having a clear project before approaching labs.
Apply only through the SMApply portal. Emailed applications are not considered.

Need a hand with your proposal? I'm happy to help
I'm glad to support you at every step:
Choosing your project: shaping your idea to fit a MOPGA theme, including the One Health angle
Finding a host lab: deciding who to approach and how to write to them
Writing the proposal: drafting and tightening each section within the character limits, especially the methodology and timeline
Polishing your CV and publication list to fit the 4-page limit
Support and recommendation letters: what to ask for and how to brief your referees
Final review: a check of the full application before you submit

Get in touch:
Email: tahakikpatil@gmail.com
Mobile / WhatsApp: 9623695024

Questions about the programme itself go to mopga@campusfrance.org. 

Applications are submitted at campusfrance.smapply.io/prog/mopga_2027.

Happy learning 🙂

Labels: , ,

Thursday, 17 September 2026

EMBO Scientific Exchange Grants: Process, Benefits, and How Selection Really Works

EMBO Scientific Exchange Grants: Process, Benefits, and How Selection Really Works

If you're a life sciences researcher looking to spend time in a lab abroad without waiting for a fixed annual deadline, the EMBO Scientific Exchange Grant is one of the more flexible options out there. Here's a practical breakdown of what it is, how the selection process works, and what I learned going through it myself.

What the Grant Actually Covers
EMBO Scientific Exchange Grants fund research visits to laboratories in EMBC member states or EMBO/EMBC global partner countries  visits can run from one week up to three months, and grantees may extend their stay up to a maximum of six months, though the EMBO grant itself only covers the first three months. The funding is specifically for travel costs and subsistence for the researcher — not dependents — with the exact subsistence rate and travel allowance depending on the destination country, and no additional expense categories are covered beyond these.
 [EMBO Scientific Exchange Grants Applications are Still Open]

Who Can Apply

The eligibility bar is broader than many people assume. You qualify if you're:

- An active PhD researcher at any career stage with at least one year of PhD research experience at the time of application 
- Currently based in a research lab in an EMBC member or global partner country, working in a field related to EMBO
- Applying to a lab in a different EMBC/partner country than your own, and one you haven't previously worked in or visited 
- Planning to return to your home lab and stay there for at least six months after the exchange 

Note that this excludes course, workshop, or symposium attendance  it's meant for hands-on research exchange, not conference travel. M.D. holders, independent researchers, and research technicians are also eligible as long as they meet the same experience and subject-area criteria.

Application Timeline

Applications go directly through EMBO's online system and are accepted year-round, there's no fixed annual call, which is a real advantage if your collaboration timeline doesn't line up with a typical grant cycle. 

That said, most guidance recommends submitting at least 30 days before your planned start date, and preferably closer to three months out, since the process involves referee reports and confirmation from the receiving institute. 

How Selection Decisions Are Made

This is the part most applicants get wrong  they treat it purely as a proposal-writing exercise. In practice, EMBO's Fellowship Office evaluates applications on five criteria:

What it's really asking 
1.Quality of the proposed project | Is it novel, and is it actually feasible in the time window you've requested? 

2. Suitability of the host lab | Does the receiving lab have the specific expertise/infrastructure the project needs? 

3. Depth and breadth of the topic | Is there enough substance in the proposal for reviewers to judge merit and feasibility — vague plans get penalized. 

4.Value of the exchange to the home lab | Will this bring back expertise, technology, or lead to collaboration/co-publication  it's not just about what you gain personally 

5. Candidate's CV, especially research experience 

6. Track record matters independently of the project's quality 

The completeness check happens first — the Fellowship Office confirms your application is complete and eligible before it goes to review, and you'll get an acknowledgment once it clears that stage. Final funding decisions are made only after that.

A Practical Note From Experience

I recently went through this process for a proposed visit to Lancaster Environment Centre to work with a collaborator there. A few things I'd flag for anyone applying:

- The host-lab fit matters more than a strong project alone. Reviewers are explicitly weighing whether that specific lab is the right place for *that specific work* a well-justified rationale for the host institution carries real weight.
- Referee selection is not a formality.
 Your referees are assessed as part of your CV/experience criterion, so choose people who can speak concretely to your research capability, not just seniority.
- Value to the home lab needs to be argued explicitly.
Don't assume reviewers will infer that the exchange benefits your home institution — state the expertise transfer or collaboration outcome directly in the proposal.

- Confirm the receiving institute's acceptance early.This is a required piece of the package, and chasing it late in the process can hold up an otherwise complete application.

The EMBO Scientific Exchange Grant is a good fit if you have a clearly scoped, feasible project and a host lab with a genuine reason to be the destination not a generic "networking visit." Because applications are rolling, the real bottleneck isn't the deadline; it's putting together a proposal tight enough to score well on all five criteria simultaneously.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, 8 September 2026

Before the PhD Began: My Two-Year Road from NET to PDKV Akola

Before the PhD Began: My Two-Year Road from NET to PDKV Akola 🌱
I finished my Master's and cleared NET in 2022. Alongside NET, I also cleared GATE and the DBT-BET (Biotechnology Eligibility Test), qualifying under Category II. On paper, that should have been the moment my PhD story started. In reality, it was only the moment the waiting began. 🕰️
What Clearing NET, GATE, and DBT-BET Actually Means 🎓
For anyone outside biotech circles reading this, here's the short version of what these three exams are and why clearing them mattered:
NET (National Eligibility Test) — conducted by CSIR-UGC (for science subjects) or ICAR (for agricultural sciences), it's the baseline qualification that makes you eligible for a Junior Research Fellowship (JRF) and for lecturer/assistant professor positions in India.
GATE (Graduate Aptitude Test in Engineering) — despite the "Engineering" in the name, GATE also covers Life Sciences and Biotechnology, and a GATE score can equally make you eligible for a JRF-equivalent fellowship or admission into M.Tech/PhD programs, especially at IITs and CSIR labs.
DBT-BET (Biotechnology Eligibility Test) — run by the Department of Biotechnology through the Regional Centre for Biotechnology, this is specific to biotech. It produces two merit lists: Category I (the top-ranked candidates) get a guaranteed DBT-JRF fellowship tenable at any Indian university where they register for a PhD. Category II — where I qualified — doesn't come with an automatic fellowship. Instead, it makes you eligible to be selected into a DBT-sponsored project, and if a Principal Investigator does select you, you're paid a fellowship equivalent to the standard NET/GATE JRF rate, as per DST guidelines.
On the fellowship amount itself: the Government of India revised research fellowship rates in 2023 (effective from January 1, 2023) across CSIR, UGC, DBT, and DST schemes uniformly. As things stand, a Junior Research Fellow earns ₹37,000 per month for the first two years, which steps up to ₹42,000 per month as a Senior Research Fellow (SRF) for the remaining tenure, once you clear the SRF upgrade assessment. On top of that, there's usually HRA (house rent allowance, where applicable) and an annual contingency grant — around ₹20,000–30,000 per year depending on the scheme — meant for books, travel, and consumables. Since my DBT-BET result was Category II rather than Category I, my own PhD fellowship at PDKV has come through the university/ICAR route rather than a direct DBT project fellowship — worth being upfront about, since Category II is often misunderstood as a consolation prize when it's really a different (and conditional) route into a project-based fellowship.
"Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire."  a line often attributed to W.B. Yeats, and one I didn't fully understand until I was standing in front of a classroom myself.
I did not have a strong enough plan for what came next, and that delay cost me time I did not realize I was losing. In the gap, I joined MGM College of Agricultural Biotechnology — my own undergraduate college — as an Assistant Professor. It turned out to be one of the most formative phases of my career, even though it was never meant to be the plan.
Learning to Teach While Barely Keeping Up 📚
Teaching there taught me the learning process itself in a way no exam ever had. But the workload was relentless. I was handling three courses every semester, and then COVID hit and compressed our semesters down to just three to three-and-a-half months. That meant squeezing a full syllabus, along with all the practicals, into a fraction of the usual time.
I ran every practical session myself. I built every lecture PPT myself. On top of the coursework, I was giving a Master's-level seminar almost daily, and I had also taken on additional charge for NSS. It was a lot of moving pieces for one person, and looking back, that overload is part of why my documentation and planning for PhD admissions slipped — I simply didn't have the bandwidth to manage both at once.

What I actually learned about being a good teacher, in hindsight:

📖 Know the UGC framework cold — not to recite it, but because it tells you what your students are actually entitled to, and where you have room to innovate within it.
🎤 Keep training yourself, not just your students — I attended 3 National-level training programs during this stretch, and each one reshaped how I ran my own classroom.
🔬 Say yes to mentoring more than feels comfortable — I ended up guiding 18 student theses across these years, and every single one taught me something I couldn't have learned from teaching alone.
🏆 Push your best students toward the bigger stage — 4 of my students went on to represent at national-level camps and competitions.
🗓️ Build the culture, not just the curriculum — between coursework, seminars, and student activities, I helped organize 78 events in total during this period, and NSS work under my charge earned institutional recognition.
✍️ Publish with your students, not just for yourself — 9 research papers came out of this period, co-authored with undergraduate and Master's students. As Franklin is often quoted: "Tell me and I forget, teach me and I remember, involve me and I learn."
If I'm honest, my PhD admission wasn't even my biggest priority during this stretch. My duty to my students and their curiosity mattered more to me in the moment — and that focus, oddly, is what carried me through the mess that came next.

A Year of Doors Closing 🚪

When I finally tried to apply for a 2023 PhD admission, it felt like every door was either locked or half-open.
Here's the honest list of where I tried — universities and institutes where I applied or interviewed, but the PhD door didn't open:

RMIT University, Australia
NIT Rourkela, India 
IISER Bhopal, India
IPK Gatersleben, Germany
KU Leuven, Belgium
University of South Bohemia, Czech Republic
Agharkar Research Institute, Pune, India
BAMU University, India
IIT Guwahati, India
IIT Indore, India
BARC, Mumbai, India

I couldn't manage the mails and logistics in time for a couple of universities. At a certain point, I genuinely let go of hope that a PhD seat would come together that cycle.

One Last Form 📝

Then the ICAR exam — delayed that year, pushed all the way to late July, with results only in October–November — gave me one more chance. I filled the form more out of habit than hope, telling myself it was my last attempt. I scored 264 out of 400, with an All India Rank of 54. Good, but the field was competitive enough that "good" didn't feel like a guarantee of anything.

While the MGM HR office approved my special study leave for the PhD program in December 2023, I was still juggling manuscripts, seminars, and student mentoring right up until the transition — the two worlds overlapped for weeks

Akola 🌾
The counseling finally came in November, and PDKV sent through my provisional admission letter that same month. It placed me at the Biotechnology Centre in Akola — a sprawling campus in the heart of Vidarbha, built for drought-prone agriculture, the kind of place that felt, after everything, like the dream land I'd been circling toward without knowing it.
That's where the next chapter — the one about the crisis that actually rebuilt me — begins. 🌿
That's story is here 👇

Sunday, 6 September 2026

From My First Flight to the Global Research Journey

A Young Indian Researcher’s Journey from PhD Research to Lancaster and Beyond

For many researchers, an international research visit begins with an acceptance letter, a grant approval or a research proposal. For me, it begins with something much more personal: my first flight abroad.

In January 2027, I will travel from India to the United Kingdom for a research visit at Lancaster University. What makes this journey special is not simply the destination. It represents a transition—from working within the familiar environment of an Indian agricultural university to experiencing an international research laboratory, scientific culture and collaborative research ecosystem.

My research interests lie at the intersection of plant biotechnology, plant physiology and sustainable agriculture. During this visit, I will have the opportunity to work in collaboration with Prof. Ian Dodd and explore questions related to water stress, plant signalling and reproductive responses in chilli (Capsicum annuum).

From a Research Question to an International Laboratory

Scientific research does not develop in isolation. A good research question often leads to another question, and sometimes the answer requires expertise, facilities or perspectives that are not available in one's own laboratory.

This is where international scientific exchange becomes valuable.

The EMBO Scientific Exchange Grant is one such mechanism. It supports research exchanges between eligible laboratories and is designed to facilitate the transfer of expertise, techniques and scientific knowledge. For researchers based in India, the programme is particularly relevant because India is an EMBO global partner.

For my own journey, the important lesson is that funding is not merely financial support—it can become a bridge between researchers, laboratories and ideas.

Learning the Funding Ecosystem

One of the most important things I have learned during this process is that research funding is not a single opportunity. It is an ecosystem.

EMBO provides several opportunities ranging from Scientific Exchange Grants to fellowships and programmes supporting scientific careers and international collaboration.

In India, the Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF) provides several research-support mechanisms. Its International Travel Support scheme, for example, provides financial assistance to eligible Indian researchers attending international scientific events and offers specific support for young researchers attending eligible training programmes, workshops and short-term schools abroad.

Other ANRF programmes support research development, including grants for researchers establishing research programmes and larger competitive research projects.

Understanding these opportunities is itself a research skill.

A young researcher needs to learn not only how to conduct experiments, analyse data and publish papers, but also how to identify the right funding mechanism, prepare a scientifically convincing proposal, build collaborations and communicate the potential impact of the research.

My First Flight: More Than Just Travel

For someone taking a first international flight, there is naturally excitement—and a little uncertainty.

Airport procedures, immigration, baggage, currency, accommodation, local transport and adapting to a new environment are all part of the experience.

But behind these practical questions lies a much larger personal milestone.

The journey from an agricultural university in India to a research laboratory in the UK is a reminder that science can create connections far beyond geographical boundaries.

The first flight therefore represents more than travelling from one country to another.

It represents travelling from familiarity towards possibility.

From India to Lancaster: Carrying Questions, Not Just Luggage

I will travel to Lancaster carrying research documents, protocols, notebooks and scientific questions.

But I will also carry something less visible: the experience of working in Indian agricultural research, the challenges faced by farmers, and the need to develop technologies that are scientifically rigorous but also relevant to real agricultural conditions.

The research question surrounding water stress in chilli is particularly important in the context of climate change.

How does a plant perceive limited water?

How are stress signals communicated?

What happens to reproductive tissues?

Can water-saving irrigation strategies influence molecular responses?

And ultimately, can understanding these mechanisms help us develop more water-efficient agricultural systems?

These questions connect plant physiology with molecular biology and sustainable agriculture.

The Bigger Lesson

My journey has also changed the way I think about a research career.

A PhD is not necessarily the end of education. It can be the beginning of a much larger scientific journey.

International research visits can expose young scientists to new methodologies, laboratory cultures, scientific discussions and collaborations. They can also help researchers understand how scientific ideas are transformed into projects, grants, publications and long-term collaborations.

The challenge is to return from such experiences not merely with certificates or publications, but with new scientific capability.

Beyond One Grant

An EMBO grant or an international research visit should not be viewed as an isolated achievement.

It can be the first step towards future collaborations, larger research proposals and independent research programmes.

Similarly, opportunities such as ANRF's International Travel Support and other research schemes demonstrate that Indian researchers have multiple avenues through which they can seek support for international scientific engagement.

The key is to start early, understand eligibility requirements, identify the right programme and build a research proposal around a genuine scientific question.

The Beginning, Not the Destination

My first flight to the UK will eventually land at an airport. But the real destination is much larger.

It is the opportunity to learn.

To collaborate.

To ask better questions.

To understand science from another perspective.

And eventually, to bring that knowledge back into the Indian research ecosystem.

From a first flight to an international laboratory, from a PhD research question to a global collaboration, and from a single grant to a long-term scientific career the journey is only beginning.

A researcher does not travel abroad merely to cross a border.
A researcher travels to cross the boundaries of knowledge.

Monday, 2 February 2026

Losing Everything Digitally : Rise Rebuild and Reinvent

In our world of studies and research, we pour our lives into our gadgets. A laptop is more than a machine—it's a vault for dreams, a record of growth, and a roadmap to the future. A phone captures quick thoughts, conversations with friends, and big aspirations. A simple pendrive holds months of hard work and ideas.
For me, that laptop was everything. I bought it with earnings from my first job. It stored my entire 20s: student notes from late nights, carefully crafted lab guides, future plans, data from three PhD research trials, research papers I poured effort into, and e-books that inspired me. It also held personal treasures: photos of cherished memories, copies of my PAN card and Aadhar card, and stories like the Battle of Panipat that taught me resilience.

On obscure day, I had an invitation to present at the BITS campus, Hydrabad. a dream venue. I traveled there excited, shared my work with experts. 

But on the return journey, alone in an AC 3 coach train, everything changed. It was January 30, my 29th birthday. The train stopped near Kachiguda, and in that brief halt, someone stole my entire bag. Gone were my laptop, mobile phone, e-Mudra pendrive, clothes, money, Aadhar card, PAN card, and even my train ticket. Vital patent files and years of step-by-step research work vanished on what should have been a joyful day.
Instead of overwhelming sadness, it became a quiet opportunity to reflect and rebuild. The theft stung, but it fueled my determination to rise stronger.

When Work Vanishes, Inner Strength Awakens
At first, I felt adrift, like a boat without an anchor. In research, we tie our progress to files and data. When they're gone, doubts flood in: Will this derail my PhD? Force a complete restart? There was no manual for this, no quick fix—just the need for patience and self-belief. Losing it all on my birthday amplified the pain, but it also revealed the gift in adversity.
What grounded me was realizing what couldn't be stolen: the core ideas in my mind, the critical thinking I'd developed, the probing questions I'd learned to ask. Knowledge isn't stored on a hard drive—it's embedded in us. Once grasped, it endures. Even more, my support network lifted me: friends offered silent help, colleagues shared their setbacks without judgment, and family reminded me that rebuilding demonstrates true strength, not defeat. They didn't restore the files, but they reignited my hope and resolve. Like in science, where collaboration solves challenges, my supporters became my partners in recovery. Their backing transformed my birthday loss into a testament to collective resilience

 Reward of Rebuilding

Starting over wasn't a burden—it became a powerful opportunity for growth. Recreating from memory sharpened my ideas, making them clearer and more concise. I identified strong concepts and those needing refinement. The rebuilt papers, lab guides, and PhD data emerged superior—not mere replicas, but enhanced and more robust. I even replaced personal documents like my PAN and Aadhar, emerging more prepared. Rebuilding after securing those awards and presenting at BITS reaffirmed my progress, elevating my work further.
This instilled practical habits rooted in wisdom, not fear. I adopted cloud backups, secure drives, and physical notes. The loss propelled me forward, proving that life's disruptions pave the way for improvement. Like the warriors at Panipat who rebuilt after defeat, I reconstructed my digital world, making it tangible and resilient. In science, experiments fail to teach us—like evolution, where adaptation ensures survival. Rebuilding elevated my work to a higher caliber, infused with fresh insights, honoring the stolen awards and presentation.
A Deeper Lesson in Growth and Fulfillment
This reshaped my view of success in our tech-driven era. Growth isn't linear—it's a winding path that strengthens us. Setbacks aren't endings; they're invitations to innovate and improve. We rely on devices to remember, but true advancement stems from our intellect and adaptability.

The theft on my 29th birthday could have soured the milestone, but it became my greatest lesson. Turning 29 marked a renewal, not just another year. I celebrated later with family and friends, reflecting on my journey and toasting new starts. That experience inspired me to write this—to share tips and encouragement for others facing similar setbacks.

In philosophy, Sant Tukaram teaches: "Sthairya hech khari pragati"—true progress lies in steadiness. And in Katy Perry's "Rise," she declares: "Don't doubt it, victory is in my veins." That resonates deeply—it affirms our innate power to triumph, regardless of obstacles.
Stepping Forward with Confidence
Now, entering my 30s, I carry this lesson with quiet strength. I'm unafraid of challenges, more patient with time, and confident in my ability to rebuild with clarity, humor, and innovation. Philosophy reminds us of balance, and science underscores how collaboration and iteration refine us. Securing those awards, presenting at BITS, and even the train theft have molded me to soar higher.

I lost everything on my birthday, but I gained something unbreakable: the conviction that from nothing, I can create greatness. Don't doubt it—victory is in your veins. And that's more than enough.

Labels:

Monday, 26 January 2026

VALORIZATION-2026: A Platform for Science, Sustainability, and Innovation

An Idea Came to Me

An idea came to me clear and simple.

What if I could meet my blog readers in person?
Not online.
Not through comments.
But through science.

You may wonder what the connection is between this idea and the title of this post.

There is a connection.

If I write it in a simple, mathematical way:

Idea = f (VALORIZATION-2026) 

What Is VALORIZATION-2026?

VALORIZATION-2026 is an upcoming international conference focused on Science & Technology Integration for the Circular Economy. on 29-30 January 2026. 

Organised by BITS Pilani, Hyderabad Campus, in collaboration with DST-SATHI, DST-PURSE, BITS-TEC, and the Institution’s Innovation Council (IIC), it brings together:

  • students and researchers

  • industry professionals and innovators

  • policymakers and entrepreneurs

This is not just a conference.
It is a platform where research meets real-world application.



Why This Conference Matters to Me

VALORIZATION-2026 feels different.

There is space for student voices, early-stage ideas, and conversations that go beyond publications and citations.

The focus is on participation, dialogue, and responsible science—exactly what meaningful research should stand for.

I’m Participating as a Researcher

I will be presenting my Master’s research titled:

“Eco-friendly Biocement Production Using MICP Bacteria for Bioconcrete Applications”

The work explores Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (MICP) as a sustainable alternative to conventional cement—aligned with themes of green materials, circular economy, and sustainable construction.

What started as a thesis became a larger question about how we build.

Thinking Beyond Cement

MICP-based materials have the potential to:

Instead of forcing strength through energy and emissions, biology allows materials to grow strength naturally and sustainably.

That shift in thinking matters.

Beyond Academia

You don’t need to be a researcher to care about this.

The buildings we live in and the infrastructure we depend on are shaped by material choices made today.
Conferences like VALORIZATION-2026 are where those choices begin to change.

A Simple Hope

I’m attending VALORIZATION-2026 to present—but more importantly, to listen, learn, and exchange ideas with people who believe research should serve the future, not exhaust it.

If you’re attending too, I hope we connect.

Sometimes, progress begins with a conversation.

Official Conference Information

Conference Title: VALORIZATION-2026

Full Name:
International Conference on Science & Technology Integration for Circular Economy

Dates:

  • Main Conference: 29–30 January 2026

  • Post-Conference Hands-on Workshop: 31 January 2026
    (for offline participants only)

Venue:
Birla Institute of Technology & Science (BITS) Pilani – Hyderabad Campus
Jawahar Nagar, Kapra Mandal
Medchal-Malkajgiri District
Hyderabad – 500078
Telangana, India

Official Conference Website:
https://www.bits-pilani.ac.in/valorization/

Brochure & Detailed Information (PDF):
Conference themes, sessions, and contact details are available here:
https://www.bits-pilani.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/VALORIZATION-2026.pdf

Conference Email (For Queries):
valorization@hyderabad.bits-pilani.ac.in

Labels: